A complete reference for the Framework for AI Fluency — the four competencies that let you use AI as a genuine thinking partner, not just an efficiency engine.
Most AI work lives in one (or more) of these modes. Knowing which one you're in shapes everything else.
You don't need to be an engineer, but knowing the basics helps you set realistic expectations and spot problems before they matter.
Four interconnected skills that together define AI Fluency. You'll cycle through all of them in almost every meaningful AI interaction.
Delegation is about making strategic choices — not just clicking "generate." It means understanding your goal, knowing what AI can (and can't) do, and thoughtfully distributing the work.
Use this table to decide which mode fits your current task.
| Mode | Best for | Use when... | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Automation | Repetitive or time-consuming tasks | You know exactly what you want and need efficiency | Requires strong quality control |
| Augmentation | Creative & complex problem-solving | You want AI as a thinking partner, not a replacement | Requires your active participation |
| Agency | Configuring AI for consistent future use | You want AI to behave consistently on your behalf | Requires sophisticated AI understanding |
Clear communication up front saves time and leads to far better results. Description is the skill of translating your intent into something AI can act on precisely.
Not every prompt needs all six elements — but the more you include, the less AI has to guess.
Discernment works hand-in-hand with Description in a continuous loop. When outputs fall short, better description is usually the fix — but only if you can first identify what's wrong.
Using AI responsibly means thoughtful choices about how you work with it, honesty about AI's role in what you produce, and full accountability for the outputs you put into the world.
Adapt this template when disclosing AI involvement in your work.
In the creation of this document, we used [AI Tool] to assist in text creation and refinement. We affirm that all AI-generated and co-created content underwent thorough vetting, editing, and curation by the human co-authors. The final document accurately reflects our understanding, expertise, and intended meaning. While AI tools were instrumental in the writing process, we maintain full responsibility for the content, its accuracy, and its presentation.
| Context | Disclosure Expectation | Verification Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Personal Use | Low — mostly for yourself | Basic common-sense check |
| Academic Work | High — follow your institution's policy | Fact-check all claims; never present AI work as fully your own |
| Professional | Medium-high — know your industry norms | Thorough review; take full ownership and accountability |
Before every meaningful AI interaction, run through these four questions.
These six techniques from the course cover the most impactful ways to improve your prompts. Click any technique to see before/after examples.
Copy, adapt, and use. Replace the [BRACKETED] placeholders with your specific details.
Give me a structured summary of [TOPIC]. Include: • What it is and why it matters (2–3 sentences) • Key concepts and frameworks • Current state / recent developments • Major debates or open questions • 3–5 implications for [MY CONTEXT] Audience: [EXPERT / NON-EXPERT] Depth: [BRIEF / DETAILED] Focus on: [SPECIFIC ANGLE]
I'm considering [PLAN / DECISION]. My reasoning: [BRIEF EXPLANATION] Please: 1. Identify the 3 strongest objections I've overlooked 2. Point out assumptions that might not hold 3. Describe a realistic scenario where this goes wrong 4. Suggest what info would most change your assessment Be direct. Don't soften the critique.
Write a professional email: To: [RECIPIENT NAME / ROLE] Context: [RELATIONSHIP + HISTORY] Main point: [WHAT YOU NEED TO SAY] Tone: [FORMAL / WARM / DIRECT] Length: [SHORT / MEDIUM / DETAILED] Include: [SPECIFIC POINTS] Avoid: [ANYTHING OFF-LIMITS] End with a single clear call to action.
Improve the following [paragraph / section]: --- [PASTE YOUR TEXT] --- My goals: [WHAT IT NEEDS TO DO] Audience: [WHO WILL READ IT] What I think is weak: [YOUR ASSESSMENT] Please: 1. Rewrite addressing the issues above 2. Explain the 2–3 main changes and why 3. Flag anything I might want to revert Keep my voice. Don't over-polish.
Create a project plan for: [PROJECT] Goal: [WHAT SUCCESS LOOKS LIKE] Timeline: [START] to [END DATE] Team: [YOUR ROLE / TEAM SIZE] Constraints: [BUDGET / DEPENDENCIES] What's decided: [FIXED DECISIONS] Output: • 4–6 milestones with target dates • 3–5 key tasks per milestone • Top 3 risks + mitigation • Open questions to resolve first
Compare [OPTION A] and [OPTION B] across: • [DIMENSION 1, e.g. cost] • [DIMENSION 2, e.g. ease of use] • [DIMENSION 3, e.g. scalability] My context: [WHAT I'M TRYING TO DECIDE] My constraints: [BUDGET / TIMELINE / etc.] Format: comparison table + short recommendation. Don't hedge — give me a direct recommendation.
Click any term to expand its definition. Filter by category using the buttons below.